Procedures for Evaluating Emergency Risk Communication Activities

Introduction

Emergency Risk Communication activities should be evaluated to determine whether program activities are accomplished as planned and deliver the necessary public health information effectively.

The steps required to do this are:

  1. Identify and determine the information needs of stakeholders, including decision makers, program staff, the media, and intended audiences.
  2. Develop a program logic model that diagrammatically illustrates how the activities are designed to achieve intended effects with target audiences.
  3. Formulate measurable performance objectives for each aspect of the activities you want evaluated.
  4. Write evaluation questions that, when answered, generate the information needed to: 1) determine the validity of your logic model, 2) provide information required to determine whether performance objectives are achieved, and 3) answer stakeholder questions.
  5. Determine the appropriate source(s) of information and the data gathering methods that will be used to collect data on stakeholder questions and action plans. (See also Tools for Research.)
  6. Formulate an evaluation design that describes how methods will be applied in collecting credible data from the various sources of information you decided on in the previous step.
  7. Develop data analysis and reporting plans and feedback channels.
  8. Prepare an evaluation timetable and budget.
  9. Prepare an evaluation implementation plan and share it with appropriate staff and stakeholders.

Useful tools:

 

 


1. Identify and determine the information needs of stakeholders, including decision makers, program staff, the media, and intended audiences.

What To Do

The first step in planning an evaluation is to identify individuals and groups who have a vested in your Emergency Risk Communication activities. This requires soliciting the information needs of key stakeholders.

How to Do It


2. Develop a program logic model that illustrates how the activities designed to achieve intended effects with target audiences.

What to do

Develop a logic model that diagrammatically illustrates and describes the sequence of events for bringing about change by synthesizing the main program elements into a picture of how the program is supposed to work. One of the virtues of a logic model is its ability to summarize how your communication activities will reach and influence each intended audience. A logic model can also display the infrastructure needed to support Emergency Risk Communication activities.

How To Do It


Step 3. Formulate measurable performance objectives for each aspect of the activities you want evaluated.

What To Do

Write communication activity objectives (standards) for each type of evaluation that will examine discrepancies between what is expected (e.g., the standard of implementation or effects) and what is observed in the evaluation process. That is, depending on the type(s) of evaluation you plan to carry out, you should write activity standards/objectives that explicitly state and quantify stakeholder expectations concerning the communication activities. For example, if stakeholders are interested in knowing about the appeal, comprehension, clarity, consistency, main points, correct tone, credibility, audience relevance, and truthfulness of the messages, you should write objectives or standards that relate to each of these factors.

How to Do It


Step 4. Write evaluation questions that, when answered, generate the information needed to: 1) determine the validity of your logic model, 2) provide information required to determine whether performance objectives are achieved, and 3) answer stakeholder questions.

What To Do

Write all the evaluation questions that need to be answered to generate the information that will be needed to 1) determine the validity of your logic model assumptions related to how the program components work together or separately to bring about intended effects, 2) provide information required to determine whether performance objectives related to such things as the development, costs, execution, reach, and effects of messages and activities are achieved, and 3) answer stakeholder questions about such things as the development, delivery, reach, costs, and/or effects of the program. These questions will be used in both developing and guiding the development of the items included on the data gathering methods described in step 5.

How To Do It


Step 5. Determine the appropriate source(s) of information and the data gathering methods that will be used to collect data on stakeholder questions and communication activity standards. (See also "Tools for Research.")

What To Do

Once evaluation questions have been decided on, you will need to decide on the source(s) of data and data gathering methods to be used to gather information. Data collection methods are numerous, but are usually classified as either qualitative or quantitative. Qualitative methods typically produce descriptive information, while quantitative methods generate numerical data such as frequencies, percentages, or rates.

How To Do It


Step 6. Formulate an evaluation design that describes how methods will be applied in collecting credible data from the various sources of information you decided on in the previous step.

What To Do

Develop an evaluation design that articulates who will do what, where, when, and how often in the process of collecting and ensuring the security of data gathered to answer stakeholder questions and to measure alignment with activity standards. An excerpt from CDC's Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health defines evaluation design:

Design refers to how the evaluation's questions, methods, and overall processes are constructed… [T]he design should be organized from the start to achieve intended uses by primary users. Having a clear design that is focused on use helps persons who will conduct the evaluation to know precisely who will do what with the findings and who will benefit from being a part of the evaluation. Furthermore, the process of creating a clear design will highlight ways that stakeholders, through their contributions, can enhance the relevance, credibility, and overall utility of the evaluation.

How To Do It


Step 7. Develop data analysis and reporting plans and feedback channels.

What To Do

Formulate a plan for analyzing data collected as part of the evaluation and for reporting it back to stakeholders. This plan should outline how both qualitative and quantitative data will be analyzed, synthesized, and reported for all evaluation questions and activity standards. The plan should also outline how conclusions will be justified.

How To Do It


Step 8. Prepare an evaluation timetable and budget.

What To Do

Develop a timeline that visually organizes the evaluation of your communication activities, materials, and other tasks to be implemented.

Develop a budget that reflects your agency's or funding agency's format. Normally, these budgets are created in a column format with direct and indirect expenses outlined in separate sections.

Budgets clearly delineate costs. You can develop your budget by ensuring that it fulfills some key objectives:

You should provide a budget narrative that details and justifies the expenses requested for extending your program into Year Three.

Be sure that the budget and budget narrative relate the same story as your objectives, program activities, methods, and program evaluation.

If the project is to be sustained over the long term, also describe a simple plan for obtaining future funding needed beyond the timeframe for which funds are available.

How To Do It


Step 9. Prepare an evaluation implementation plan and share it with appropriate staff and stakeholders.

What To Do

Summarize your evaluation plan for the benefit of program staff, partners, and stakeholders who may be interested in or need to know what you plan to do and who will be involved in carrying out your various evaluation activities. This summary should be tailored and disseminated to the audiences you specified in your internal and external communication plans.

How To Do It