|
 |
| |
| Use the following links to
read comments from this year's participants about their experiences at
Lindau 2005.
Participants By Last Name
A-I | J-N | O-Z |
Denise Pauler
Jeffrey Peterson
Rodney Priestley
Matthew Rakher
Amanda Sabourov
Edward Sambriski
Germarie Sanchez-Pomales
Mandy Sapp |
Barclay Satterfield
Brandi Schottel
Mark Smith
Lee-Ann Smith-Freeman
Kimia Sobhani
Sarah Soisson
Tighe Spurlin
Stephen Straight |
Claretta Sullivan
Evan Thomas
Kristylea Thompson
Rachel Tittle
Lawrence Tynes
Maggie Walser
Jeremy Yancey |
|
Denise Pauler (Los Alamos National
Laboratory)
|

This was a wonderful
experience for me and reinvigorated my interest in science. The main
message of the meeting (from both students and Laureates) was to do what
you are most interested in. This has given me the reassurance to take some
chances in my academic career that I otherwise may have avoided. The
lecture that had the most value for me was one given by a physicist who
won the prize in medicine and physiology for his work with MRI.
back to
top |
|
Jeffrey Peterson (University of Rochester)
|
|

The biggest benefit was the perspective offered by the Laureates. I
especially found meaningful those talks that emphasized the importance of
continuing to ask questions. I think as a graduate student it is quite
easy to become completely focused in one's own little corner of the world.
I was struck by the Laureates who not only mastered a specific question
but kept there eyes on the "big" questions in their field and how their
work related to these. They seemed keenly aware of questions and issues
they did not know the answers to and sought to investigate these in their
work.
back to
top
|
|
Rodney Priestley (Northwestern
University) |
|
To meet the Noble Laureates was a
great experience. Meeting the Laureates gave me added confidence in my
abilities as a scientist and motivated me to achieve my fill potential.
Whenever I am in a scientific slump I can also look back on this
experience for motivation and encouragement.
There
were two Laureates who attended the meeting (Heeger and MacDiarmid) that
won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for 2000 for work on polymers. Both their
talks were very interesting to me since my research is in the area of
polymers. The best informal discussions that I had with Laureates was at
the dinner sessions. Overall, my experience in Lindau was excellent. I
would recommend it to all my friends. It was a great meeting and will
always be a memorable experience for me.
back to
top |
|
Matthew Rakher (University
of California, Santa Barbara) |
|
I
think the best thing about meeting the Laureates was hearing about their
experiences as scientists and absorbing the useful advice they had for a
successful career in science. I also enjoyed learning about them as people
outside of their lives as scientists. I obtained the most value from
Manfred Eigen's lecture because it was nice to see a mathematical
formulation of competition in evolution.
back to
top |
|
Amanda Sabourov (Duke
University) |
|
Meeting and speaking with
the Laureates was refreshing. Their stories of when they were struggling
grad students really helped me to put things in perspective and helped me
come away from the meeting with a more optimistic view. The most wonderful
thing I heard at the meeting was during Charles Townes' talk when a
student asked him how you deal with failures in your research. He smiled,
told us about some of his failures and pointed out that nearly every
"failure" is a success in itself if viewed correctly. I found this very
inspiring. The very best part of all the discussions was listening to the
Laureates tell stories about their lives as students and their
interactions with many of the people that we've heard of through our
lessons. It felt often more like sitting around the kitchen table with a
cup of coffee and your grandfather and learning about the way their lives
were and the experiences they had. It was great. This meeting was
wonderful.
back to
top
|
|
Edward Sambriski (University of Oregon) |
|
Their
inspirational words touched me in a special way and now I count with the
courage to finish what I started and to assess the increasing importance
that science has in our society as we tackle worldwide problems today and
tomorrow. Persistence and the seeking of truth lie at the heart of our
work as scientists, and our being exhorted to question everything will
likely lead to us come forth with steadfast solutions to the questions we
now face.
back to
top
|
|
Germarie Sanchez-Pomales (University
of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras) |
|

The opportunity to
hear their views on different topics such as ethics, managing a research
laboratory, life and fame after the Nobel Prize, starting new research
projects, and life outside the laboratory, among others, was very
enlightening. The meeting gave me the chance to renew my scientific
curiosity and my passion for my research work and it allow me to realize
that hard work, perseverance and dedication are the right paths towards
professional success. One of the highlights of my trip was the
opportunity of organizing a lunch for Latino-American students. German and
American students joined others from Chile, Venezuela, Spain, Argentine
and Puerto Rico, and the lunch served as a very interesting cultural
exchange. I truly believe that this trip was an unforgettable experience.
Meeting many of the world’s top scientists is an once-in-a-lifetime
opportunity.
back to
top
|
|
Mandy Sapp (Oregon
State University) |
|
It
was truly eye opening to listen to so many of the Nobel Laureates speak on
the topic of climate change, sustainability and development of renewable
energy sources. Conversations with the Laureates and students at the
conference helped me realize how little I know about this topic as well as
politics, international environmental policy and much more. I’ve returned
home refreshed, with added excitement for my research, and a new
hobby—learning about climate change and environmental policy! I plan to
get informed about my local environment and climate change on a broader
scale so that I can engage community members and state government
representatives in dialogue.
back to
top
|
|
Barclay Satterfield (Princeton
University) |
|

I was REALLY inspired by
the discussion of science and policy--the call by the Laureates to us as
younger scientists to make sure we are heard and participate in government
decision-making. My dream is to go into environmental technology policy,
so I really, really enjoyed the talks about global warming and was very
inspired by the call to action from scientist to scientist.
back to
top
|
|
Brandi Schottel (Texas
A&M University) |
|

As for my experiences
with the Nobel Laureates, I found most of them to be quite charming and
charismatic. They particularly wanted to engage the students around them
in great discussions which were quite an honorable experience for me. As a
result of knowing so many of them, I now feel no intimidation about
meeting with any scientist despite their stature.
back to
top
|
|
Mark Smith (Kansas State University) |
|
I
attended all the plenary lectures and the discussion lectures of Martinus
Veltman, Charles Townes, and Paul Crutzen. Townes meeting was the most
enjoyable thing of the entire meeting. He shared his experiences over his
career in physics, how he did things others dismissed out of hand.
back to
top
|
|
Lee-Ann Smith-Freeman (University
of Southern California) |
|

The chance to meet the
Nobel Laureates was a truly humbling and encouraging experience. The Nobel
Laureates are our "celebrities" and to learn about their research,
passions and personal lives was invaluable to me as a maturing scientist.
I gained more confidence in myself by talking about scientific issues with
several of the Nobel Laureates and even overcame my fear of asking
questions.
back to
top
|
|
Kimia Sobhani (University
of Washington) |
My interest in science
and the pursuit of knowledge was reinvigorated by meeting with the
laureates and I cannot think of a better outcome or benefit of any
scientific meeting than that. I will forever carry the memories of this
meeting and the lessons I learned from so many diverse and intelligent
people with me. Sir Harold Kroto's presentation during the morning session
was extremely inspiring and entertaining and I took away lessons just from
observing him speak and so raptly engaging the audience. Although I had
previously known the importance of having good public speaking skills as a
scientist before watching Dr. Kroto, seeing him really brought home the
difference between having people being bored listening to ideas that were
in fact very interesting and vice versa; Dr. Kroto was indeed a virtuoso.
back to
top
|
|
Sarah Soisson (Texas
A&M University) |
|
The lecture that had the
most value to me was Prof. Sir Harold Kroto's "2010 a Nanospace Odyssey".
His message was to remind all of us that science is for everyone and that
even some of the most difficult concepts to grasp and new technologies can
be taught to the general public and children. The Laureates are just
ordinary people who happened to dream up an extraordinary idea and where
at the right place at the right time to make it happen. Any one of us
could have an idea at any moment in time that could shape an entire field
of science. The Laureates have a lot to teach the next generation, not
just about what they do or have contributed to science, but about life
itself.
back to
top
|
|
Tighe Spurlin (University
of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign) |

Meeting with the Nobel Laureates also inspired me
because many of them overcame significant hardships in life/research and
still accomplish significant scientific work. The close social interaction
with Nobel Laureates allowed me to hone communication and networking
skills that will aid me in the future.
back to
top
|
|
Stephen Straight (Arizona State University) |
|
I
think the most valuable thing I took away from this meeting is that the
Laureates are just like everyone else (or at least as much as scientists
are like everyone else). Simply winning the Prize doesn’t suddenly afford
one new knowledge on all subjects; it does however mean that more people
listen to them when they speak on a subject. I think these are important
lessons to learn for scientists in training, not to be in such awe of
anyone that you accept was they're saying as fact without thinking about
it first.
back to
top
|
|
Claretta Sullivan (Oak Ridge National
Laboratory) |
|
Hands
down, the most inspiring part of the trip was meeting Prof. Roderick
MacKinnon. I attended the meeting
with hopes of meeting him, and I was a bit worried by Friday that I might
not get the chance. Thankfully, the return trip from Mainau presented an
opportunity. He was sitting on the top deck talking with his wife and
Professor Blobel. One student approached him with questions followed by
others of us who were waiting for an indication that he was willing to
talk. He graciously pulled up chairs to include all of us. When the rain
began to pour, he ushered us to a covered area on the top deck. As the
wind and rain increased, he found a place inside where all of us could sit
and talk. He patiently answered every question and stayed with us until
the boat pulled into the dock near their hotel. It was wonderful!
back to
top
|
|
Evan Thomas (Louisiana
State University) |
|
I particularly enjoyed the lectures given by Kurt
Wüthrich, Robert Curl, Peter Agre and Roderick MacKinnon. Each of these
lecturers was able to convey the idea that the future of the world lies in
the basic understanding and the application of methodologies which address
the essential needs of humanity. I especially benefited from the lunches
and dinners arranged by our sponsors with the Laureates, where I was
afforded the chance to get to know them on a more personal level. I
quickly realized that the knowledge that these guys possessed and the
topics they were willing to discuss were not limited to their specific
research areas. The topics of our informal discussions ranged from
politics and stem cell research to life as a graduate student. At a lunch
with Peter Agre, however, we managed to discuss all of the above in
addition to religion, ethics, and the education of today’s youth with an
emphasis on the encouragement of pursuing careers in science.
back to
top
|
|
Kristylea Thompson (Marquette
University) |
|
It
was such an honor to be selected for this wonderful opportunity. It was an
inspiration to meet individuals that have accomplished so much in their
own lives and the lives of many others. Their work was the foundation
and/or stepping stone to the current state of our knowledge. The thought
of making an impact such as that is nothing short of motivating and
inspiring. I enjoyed the morning individual lectures. Being of a biology
background, I was interested in hearing about other research fields,
especially physics.
back to
top
|
|
Rachel Tittle (University of Michigan) |
It was useful to start thinking about all the career possibilities that
come with science education- not just academics. The main thing I learned
was that the laureates are normal people, and that they worked hard
because they were studying something really interesting to them. Also, I
already feel less nervous around famous scientists.
back to
top
|
|
Lawrence Tynes (Hampton University) |
|
Experiencing the pontifications of the laureates helped me to realize that
laureates are just people, and not all knowing. It has given me more
confidence in my ability and ambitions as a scientist. It was inspiring to
see the humility and good nature of some of the laureates. This shows me
that I do not have to be completely arrogant and dogmatic to be a high
level scientist. The lectures I remember most are the lectures on
evolution and global warming. They showed me that the ability to think
rationally has no dependence on titles.
back to
top
|
|
Maggie Walser (University of California, Irvine) |
|
I
found the round table discussion on Global Warming to be the most relevant
to my own research and interests. I also gained from the lectures that
were completely outside my own field. Sometimes we get so caught up in our
own research, we forget that there is a lot of amazing science being done
in a broad range of disciplines, so it was exciting to hear about a lot of
different projects.
back to
top
|
|
Jeremy Yancey (Mississippi
State University) |
|
The
first Nobel Laureate that I actually met in person was Prof. Richard
Ernst. He and his wife ate dinner at a table with me, two other American
students, an Italian journalist, and a Japanese student. Ernst asked
everyone at the table what school we were associated with and what type of
research we conducted. The students were a bit shy at first but Ernst used
a great deal of humor and charm to open up the table to discussion. At one
point, he went back to the buffet line and brought our table two plates of
strawberries and distributed them to everyone in a joking manner and
followed that up by pulling out his laptop to show us all a slideshow of
his Tibetan art collection. Ernst left us all with a very memorable first
Nobel dinner and gave us a wonderful first impression of how unique and
entertaining a Laureate could be. Every moment that I spent with these
brilliant scientists helped to build my own confidence and nurture
excitement toward research in an immeasurable way.
back to
top
|
|
back to Lindau 2005 Home |
|
|
|
DOE Office of
Science | National Science Foundation |
ORISE
Educational Opportunities
ORISE
Home Page | ORAU Home Page
Questions
and comments on this site? Send an e-mail
10/21/2005
|