|
Resources & Tools |
|
|
|
|
In addition to this page, references are listed in other sections of the DDSC Web site as follows:
MARSSIM |
|
|
|
NCRP Report No. 146, Approaches to Risk Management in Remediation of
Radioactively Contaminated Sites (2004) This report identifies and analyzes current guidance and practices used by the U.S. NRC under the License Termination Rule and the EPA under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, commonly known as Superfund) and the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollutions Contingency Plan in the remediation of radioactively contaminated sites. The Report identifies, analyzes and summarizes the significant differences and commonalities in current practices of NRC and EPA, and future implications of current practices as they relate to issues of public perception, uncertainty, measurability, and estimation of radiation dose and risk. |
|
|
Decommissioning: Lessons To Learn by John McKeown. June 2003, IAEA Bulletin Vol.45, No. 1. "Sharing experience and working together is important to allow the world nuclear community to respond to the challenge of restoring nuclear facilities safely, and cost effectively." |
|
|
Revised Analyses of Decommissioning Reference Non-Fuel-Cycle Facilities,
December 2002, NUREG/CR-6477. This NRC NUREG report provided cost information for the conceptual decommissioning of non-fuel-cycle nuclear facilities that represent a significant decommissioning task in terms of decontamination and disposal activities. This study is a re-evaluation of the original study (NUREG/CR-1754 and NUREG/CR-1754, Addendum 1). The reference facilities examined in this study are the same as in the original study and include: a laboratory for the manufacture of 3H-labeled compounds, 14C-labeled compounds, 125I-labeled compounds, 137Cs sealed sources, 241Am sealed sources, and an institutional user laboratory. In addition to the laboratories, three reference sites that require some decommissioning effort were also examined. These sites are: a site with a contaminated drain line and hold-up tank, a site with a contaminated ground surface, and a tailings pile containing uranium and thorium residues. |
|
Best Practices for Effective Public Involvement in Restricted Use
Decommissioning of NRC - Licensed Facilities Cleanup of sites contaminated with radiation can be extremely controversial in the community where the site is located. Such controversy is exacerbated when a licensee proposes restricted use decommissioning rather than cleaning the site to meet unrestricted use guidelines. Public knowledge of the issues and involvement in decision-making is crucial for restricted use proposals. |
|
|
U.S,
Department of Energy: Environmental Measurements Laboratory - HASL-300 |
|
|
U.S.
Department of Energy: Environmental Measurements Laboratory - QAP
The
EML QAP is an external, independent, performance evaluation program
designed to test the quality of environmental radiological measurements
reported by DOE contractor and subcontractor laboratories. The program
provides DOE with complex-wide comparability of environmental radiological
analyses. |
|
|
U.S.
Department of Energy: Environmental Measurements Laboratory - C2D2 |
|
| Decommissioning
Nuclear Reactors
a. "Nuclear Shutdown." Civil Engineering Magazine, April 2001. b. "A Graceful Exit? Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors." Environment, July/August 2001.
|
|
|
The Decommissioning and Dismantling of Nuclear Facilities: Status, Approaches, Challenges |
|
| American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Decommissioning Standard Guides November 2005 data. | |