The last
step in your monitoring and evaluation planning involves:
- Determining
how the data will be analyzed
- Deciding
how results will be summarized, interpreted, disseminated and used
to improve program implementation
- Developing
an evaluation timetable and budget
- Folding
the monitoring and evaluation plan into your overall program plan
When this
step is completed, program staff, evaluators, partners and stakeholders
will have a shared understanding of how monitoring and evaluation
relates to the program.
Analysis
Your
plan should outline how the data for each monitoring and evaluation
question will be coded, summarized and analyzed. Evaluation data analysis
is technically complex, and expert assistance may be required.
It’s
also good to have the plan address:
- how
conclusions will be justified (e.g.,
how the data relate to standards, if there are any)
- how
stakeholders both inside and outside the agency will be kept
informed about the monitoring and evaluation activities and findings
and supported in using the information that
is generated
- when
the monitoring and evaluation activities will be implemented and
how they are timed in relation to program implementation
- costs
of monitoring and evaluation, presented in the format preferred or
required by your agency or funding agency.
Reporting
results
Describe
how the monitoring and evaluation data will be reported. Plan to
use whatever formats have been stipulated by program managers and
stakeholders.
In general,
feedback can be provided through either oral or written reports.
They should be brief, understandable and well organized.
The reports
should include several key parts:
- A brief
description of the program components and activities that will be
assessed by monitoring and evaluation
- The monitoring
and evaluation questions and methods that will be used and where
they came from
- How results
will be interpreted, and when and how they will be available
Consult
CDC’s Framework for Program Evaluation in Public
Health for
several additional suggestions
about reporting data collected
for an evaluation. (See Evaluation
Framework)
Develop
a timetable and budget
Monitoring
is ongoing, but you have to decide when to collect information to
answer evaluation questions. Interventions should be fully operational
before they are evaluated. If evaluation data are intended to inform
a program decision, the data must be gathered and reported in a timely
fashion.
Document
your timeline in a format that is familiar to or otherwise makes
sense for your program or agency.
Format
options include Gantt charts, PERT charts and others. Whatever option
you choose, your timeline should cover:
- Evaluation
activities (e.g., obtaining resources, hiring personnel, securing
a vendor, obtaining IRB clearance if needed, recruiting participants,
collecting data, analyzing data, reporting findings)
- Program
activities
A monitoring
and evaluation budget should be based on your goals and objectives
as well as your methods. In other words, you should spend the most
to measure program priorities.
Describe
all the budget items using your internal budget formats, including
direct and indirect costs, and provide a budget narrative that details
and justifies the funding requested for monitoring and evaluation.
Your budget
should:
- Tell
the same story as your monitoring/evaluation narrative
- Include
detailed descriptions or justifications if needed
- Estimate
monitoring/evaluation costs to be incurred during the program's duration
- Set aside
funds for miscellaneous or contingency expenses
- Include
all items required by the funding source
- Include
all items paid for by other sources
- Include
volunteer and in-kind services to be provided
- Detail
fringe benefits separate from salaries, if required
- Include
all fees for consultants or contractors
- Delineate
details of all non-personnel costs
- Include
indirect costs when appropriate
You are
now ready to summarize the monitoring and evaluation reporting plan,
timeline and budget in My Plan.
Incorporating
the monitoring and evaluation plan into the larger intervention
plan helps program staff and stakeholders
understand:
- the rationale
for the various monitoring and evaluation activities,
- the timing
in relation to the program, and
- how efforts
will be coordinated so that evaluation activities don't impinge on
program implementation.
This
plan can be circulated as needed. For example, it
will provide you with all the
information you need to submit
a research proposal to an Institutional
Review Board. This is a body
usually based in a university,
health department or contract research
firm that examines proposed research with
a eye towards ethical treatment of human
participants. Program evaluation is sometimes
declared exempt or is reviewed on an expedited basis,
because it does not present much risk to participants
and does not collect or retain information that could
identify them.